Plane vs Huly (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, licensing, and self-hosting.
Bottom line: choose Plane if you want a focused, Linear-style issue tracker with the most active, fast-moving open-source community; choose Huly if you want project management bundled with docs and chat in a single self-hosted platform.
Plane is a dedicated project management tool — issues, cycles, and modules with a keyboard-first UI — and it has the stronger momentum of the two, with over 50,000 GitHub stars and a company shipping near-weekly releases plus a hosted cloud option for teams that don't want to self-host at all. Its AGPL-3.0 license requires publishing changes if you distribute a modified, network-served fork.
Huly is broader by design: the same self-hosted stack also replaces your docs tool and your team chat, including built-in audio/video huddles, at the cost of a heavier deployment (2+ vCPU, 8GB RAM recommended) and a shorter maintenance track record. Its EPL-2.0 license is friendlier to commercial/internal use than AGPL, but Huly Inc. shut down its own hosted cloud in 2026, leaving self-hosting as the only supported option.
For teams that specifically want issue tracking done exceptionally well, with an active roadmap and a cloud fallback, Plane is the safer pick. For teams that want to consolidate PM, docs, and chat into one deployment, Huly covers more ground in a single install.
Plane
Open-source project management platform in the style of Linear, Jira, and Asana.
Pros
- Fast, modern UI that mirrors Linear's keyboard-driven workflow
- Free self-hosted Community edition with no user cap
- Active development with 50k+ GitHub stars and frequent releases
Cons
- AGPL-3.0 core means any modified, network-served fork must publish its source
- Some enterprise features (SAML SSO, advanced admin) are cloud/paid-only
Huly
Open-source all-in-one project management platform combining issues, docs, and chat.
Pros
- Genuinely replaces several tools at once (PM + docs + chat) in a single self-hosted stack
- Fast, modern UI comparable to Linear/Notion
- Fully open source under EPL-2.0 with no feature gate on self-hosting
Cons
- Huly Inc discontinued its own hosted cloud service in 2026 — self-hosting is now the only supported path
- Younger project than OpenProject or Redmine, so long-term stability is less proven
Plane vs Huly: spec comparison
| Spec | Plane | Huly |
|---|---|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | EPL-2.0 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | Free / self-host | Free / self-host |
| Pricing model | open-core | free |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Platforms | web, self-hosted, docker | web, self-hosted, docker, desktop |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| GitHub stars | 53,600 | 26,401 |
FAQ
Plane vs Huly: which is better?
Neither is universally better. Plane (Free / self-host) suits Teams that want Linear's speed and UX but need to self-host or avoid per-seat pricing.; Huly (Free / self-host) suits Small teams that want project management, docs, and chat unified in one self-hosted platform.. The spec table above breaks down the differences.
Is Plane or Huly cheaper?
Both start at the same price (Free / self-host).